Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

On March 8, 2024, Judge J. Campbell Barker of the Eastern District of Texas, issued an <a href="https://www.michaelbest.com/portalresource/Eastern_District_of_Texas_Chamber_of_Commerce_NLRB_Decision_3.24" target="_blank" rel="noopener">order</a> vacating the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) 2023 joint employer rule. This applies nationwide. <a href="https://www.michaelbest.com/Newsroom/326006/NLRB-Issues-Final-Rule-on-Joint-Employer-Standard">As detailed in our earlier alert</a>, the NLRB was set to implement its final rule on December 26, 2023. However, the regulation was postponed with an effective date of March 11, 2024.

core/paragraph

The federal court’s order takes issue with the seemingly broad impact of the NLRB’s 2023 joint employer rule. Judge Barker reasoned that under the 2023 rule, “if an entity exercises or has the power to exercise control (even indirect control) over at least one essential term, the entity is an employer, jointly with workers’ undisputed employer.” Therefore, “virtually every entity that contracts for labor as a joint employer because virtually every contract for third-party labor has terms that impact, at least indirectly, at least one of the specified ‘essential terms and conditions of employment.’”

Additionally, the order found the NLRB’s reason for rescinding the 2020 joint employer rule was arbitrary and capricious. Now, the 2020 joint employer rule remains law. This is a welcome reprieve to employers, as the 2020 joint employer rule is considered more employer friendly.

NLRB Chairman Lauren McFerran stated that the NLRB is “reviewing the decision and actively considering next steps in this case.” The NLRB can appeal this decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.  The federal court’s rebuke of the NLRB is not unexpected and is another in a growing line of cases where the courts are limiting the NLRB’s attempted pro-union and pro-employee decision-making.  If you have any questions about how this ruling impacts your business, please contact your Michael Best team.

Close-up of a wooden judge’s gavel resting on a sounding block in a courtroom setting.

Federal District Court Strikes Down National Labor Relations Board Joint Employer Rule

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Merging Missions: What Religious Non-Profits Need to Know Before Joining Forces

NLRB 2026 Outlook: Return to the 2020 Joint‑Employer Rule and a Shift Away from Work‑Rule Enforcement

Born a Litigator: What I’ve Learned About Preventing Business Disputes