Home > Newsroom > Effective Date Of the Non-Compete Ban Identified – September 4, 2024
NewsToday the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) final rule banning noncompetition agreements was published in the Federal Register (the “Final Rule”). This publication date is important because it starts the 120-day clock for when the rule becomes effective (and enforceable)—i.e. Wednesday, September 4, 2024 (the “Effective Date”). As we noted in our prior Client Alert, the Final Rule bans any new non-competes with “workers” or “senior executives” on or after the Effective Date, requires employers to notify “workers” of the invalidity of any existing non-compete provisions in any agreements by the Effective Date, but allows for existing noncompete agreements to continue for all current “senior executives.” Potential Delay To The Effective Date. Within 24 hours of the FTC voting to approve the Final Rule, several entities including Ryan, LLC, the United States Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable filed lawsuits against the FTC in the Federal Court seeking injunctions to postpone the Effective Date and to invalidate the Final Rule. Additional lawsuits have been filed, and are anticipated to be filed, by other interested parties. The lawsuits argue, among other things, that the FTC does not have the authority to create such a ban and that it has exceeded its legislative mandate from Congress in instituting the Final Rule. What To Do Now? Employers may continue to wait and see what will happen given that the Final Rule will not be effective until the beginning of September 2024, the current legal challenges may result in injunctions extending that timeline, and/or the Final Rule may be invalidated all together. However, as we noted in our original Client Alert, there are certain steps employers can take now to prepare for the possibility of the Final Rule going into effect should it survive legal challenges, including:
- Begin gathering all potentially covered agreements (including sale/purchase of business agreements, NDAs, IP ownership agreements, non-competition, and non-solicitation agreements) to determine which are covered by the Final Rule.
- Prepare required notices now so that employers are ready to send them before the deadline (which may be delayed by the courts).
- Modify existing agreements as appropriate for future use in the event the FTC Rule remains in effect.
Employers should continue to monitor progress of the legal challenges to the Final Rule so that they are prepared to address its requirements if or when they finally do take effect.
If you have any questions, please contact your Michael Best attorney. Related People Preview Attorney's BiographyVictor represents clients in a broad scope of litigation matters in both state and federal courts. His experience encompasses pre-suit investigations, motion practice, discovery, mediation, trial work, and collecting on judgments.  Preview Attorney's BiographyLuis represents employers in a range of labor and employment matters and has developed a significant practice focusing on employee defection and recruitment, including litigating injunction and damage actions relating to: covenants not to compete, non-solicitation and non-disclosure agreements, unfair competition, trade secrets, duty of loyalty, the Computer Fraud & Abuse Act, and state trade secrets and unfair competition statutes.  Preview Attorney's BiographyBusinesses, owners, and boards of directors look to Scott as their outside general counsel to ensure legal compliance of their operations and initiatives. Scott also represents businesses and manages litigation in federal and state courts and administrative agencies throughout the country in all areas of employment law. .jpg) Preview Attorney's BiographyKerryann serves as a trusted advisor to companies seeking a pragmatic, solutions-oriented approach to employment matters. Clients value her depth of knowledge and unfaltering commitment to their business goals. Kerryann is an experienced and effective litigation strategist, successfully defending clients in employment disputes at the federal and state levels. She uses her litigation experience to assess employment practices and to structure personnel polices to increase workplace productivity and minimize the threat of litigation.  Preview Attorney's BiographyFarrah serves Michael Best in two capacities: as partner in the Labor and Employment Relations Practice Group. Her practice focuses on employment counseling and employment litigation, with a particular emphasis on discrimination, noncompetition, and Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).  Preview Attorney's BiographyEric advises clients in all areas of labor and employment law. With a practice that is national in scope, he is particularly active in litigating matters involving trade secrets, non-competition agreements and related disputes. Eric has a nationally recognized practice in the area of contingent labor and regularly prepares and reviews policies, procedures and contracts and litigates contested matters for users and providers of temporary employees, consultants, independent contractors and other contingent talent.  Preview Attorney's BiographyCourtney is an experienced commercial, business, and employment litigator with a lengthy record of success in bench and jury trials. He represents employers, companies, executives, and officers in a broad range of industry sectors. Courtney’s clients have included hedge funds, their founders and valued employees, private equity firms, property managers, major food producers, manufacturers, retailers, and fine art collectors, among others.
|
back to top |