Read

October 13, 2026

3 minute read

Most companies assume that if they paid for it, they own it. In intellectual property law, that assumption is often wrong. The logo a freelancer designed, the code a contract developer wrote, the video a production company shot, and the invention a founder sketched before incorporation may all belong to someone other than the business that relies on them. These gaps usually surface at the worst possible time: during a financing round, an acquisition, a licensing deal, or litigation.

Below are some of the most common ownership mistakes, and how to avoid them.

1. Contractors and Freelancers: "Work Made for Hire" Isn't Automatic

Under U.S. copyright law, works created by employees within the scope of their employment generally belong to the employer. Independent contractors are different. A commissioned work qualifies as a "work made for hire" only if it falls within one of a limited set of statutory categories and the parties agree to that in a signed writing. Many common deliverables do not fit neatly into those categories.

The fix: Contractor agreements should include both work-made-for-hire language and a present assignment of all rights ("hereby assigns") as a backstop. Get the agreement signed before work begins, not after the invoice is paid.

2. Creators and Content Producers: Rights in the Pieces, Not Just the Whole

Videos, podcasts, marketing campaigns, and other creative projects often combine contributions from many people, including writers, photographers, musicians, on-camera talent, and editors, along with licensed stock assets. Owning the finished product does not necessarily mean owning, or having cleared, every component.

The fix: Use written releases and assignments for each contributor, keep track of third-party licenses and their limits (term, territory, media, exclusivity), and confirm that the production company is actually able to transfer what it promises.

3. Consultants and Advisors: Watch the "Background IP"

Consultants frequently bring pre-existing tools, methods, and materials to an engagement. Without clear terms, it can be unclear whether a deliverable incorporates the consultant's background IP, and whether the client can keep using it after the engagement ends.

The fix: Distinguish between background IP (retained by the consultant) and project IP (assigned to the client). Where background IP is embedded in deliverables, secure a perpetual, irrevocable license broad enough for the business's actual and anticipated uses.

4. Developers: Code, Open Source, and Repositories

Software ownership problems tend to multiply quietly. Offshore or agency developers may subcontract work, contributors may commit code without signed agreements, and open-source components may carry license obligations that affect how the product can be distributed or commercialized.

The fix: Require that development agencies obtain assignments from their own personnel and subcontractors, maintain records of who contributed what, and conduct periodic open-source audits. Investors and acquirers increasingly expect this diligence to be complete before they review it.

5. Founders: The Pre-Formation Problem

Founders often begin building a product, brand, creative work, or invention before the company exists. Unless those rights are formally assigned to the company, they may remain with the individual founder, which becomes a serious problem if a founder departs or a dispute arises.

The fix: At formation, have each founder sign an IP assignment covering prior work related to the business, along with a confidentiality and invention assignment agreement going forward. Patent applications and trademark filings should be made in the company's name, or assigned to it promptly.

6. Employees: Don't Overlook the Paperwork

Employee-created work is generally safer, but not for every type of IP. Patent rights, for example, typically require an express assignment, and questions about "scope of employment" can arise for work done off-hours or on personal equipment. Some states also limit how broadly employers can claim employee inventions.

The fix: Use invention assignment agreements for all employees, tailored to applicable state law, and include the required statutory notices where they apply.

The Bottom Line

IP ownership problems are almost always cheaper to prevent than to fix. A corrective assignment obtained years later, if the creator can even be found and is willing to sign, can cost far more than getting the paperwork right the first time. In litigation, a gap in the chain of title can undermine standing to sue or invite a challenge to ownership itself.

A periodic IP ownership audit that reviews contractor agreements, founder documents, employee agreements, and key third-party licenses is one of the most practical steps a business can take to protect the assets it depends on.

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these