Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

<p>A federal judge in California recently remanded a case back to state court because the remote work practices of the defendant's executives rendered the company a resident of California for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, illustrating the altered landscape presented by post-COVID employment practices. </p><p>In the case <i>Evans v. Cardlytics, Inc.</i>, 23-CV-606-JWK-KES (C.D. Cal.), two California residents sued their former employer over a pay dispute.  The defendant, a digital ad platform incorporated in Delaware with its headquarters in Atalanta removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, which requires plaintiffs and defendants to be citizens of different states.  </p><p>Of course, a corporation is a resident of its state of incorporation as well as the state where its principal place of business is located. To determine the latter, the court had to decide the location of the defendant's “nerve center” - i.e., “the place where a corporation’s officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation’s activities.” Four of Cardlytics' seven-member leadership team lived and worked in California, with the Golden State executives including both the CEO and the COO. Embracing the anatomic analogy, the Court reasoned that “the CEO and COO are akin to the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus,” and determined that both the quantitatively and qualitatively the majority of defendant's leadership team was located and worked in California. As a result, Cardlytics was unable to carry its burden of showing its principal place of business was in Georgia and not California.</p><p>While traditionally you would simply look to the location of a company's headquarters to determine its principal place of business, we don't live in traditional times.  Advanced technology combined with the disruption of the COVID 19 pandemic has created decentralized work forces and blurred the lines of corporate residency. </p><input type='hidden' id='passle-remote-hosting-tracking-shortcode' value='102iscg'/><blockquote class="wp-block-quote passle-quote has-cite-link"><cite><a href="https://www.law360.com/pulse/daily-litigation/articles/1764842/bosses-work-from-home-upends-federal-court-jurisdiction" aria-label="www.law360.com/..." title="https://www.law360.com/pulse/daily-litigation/articles/1764842/bosses-work-from-home-upends-federal-court-jurisdiction" target="_blank">www.law360.com/...</a></cite></blockquote><div class="passle-featured-image passle-featured-image-position-bottom"><img src="https://images.passle.net/fit-in/400x400/filters:crop(38,0,2197,1239)/Passle/5f6edd8e8cb62a0bec3e5fd2/SearchServiceImages/2023-11-10-22-11-28-316-654eaa90c9441a5a1e19e380.jpg" alt="Featured Image" /></div>

Remote Work Gives Diversity a Twist

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Michael Best Welcomes Dana Bell as Senior Counsel in Intellectual Property Practice

Seventh Circuit Grapples with BIPA Amendment.

Federal Court Blocks Oregon EPR Law — Implications Beyond Oregon