Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

The projects I work on evolve over time in response to my clients’ business priorities. Recently, I have been advising clients on provisional patent applications. Some of those clients are surprised by my guidance: provisional applications can create a false sense of security.As the name suggests, a provisional application is preliminary. It is not examined by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and, if not converted to a non‑provisional application within the statutory period, provides no enforceable patent rights.There are valid reasons to file a provisional application. Provisional applications are generally less expensive than non‑provisional applications and can be useful when facing tight deadlines, such as an imminent customer presentation. Nevertheless, I file relatively few provisionals. The Patent Office will accept almost any submission as a provisional application, including materials such as PowerPoint slides or sketches, which keeps costs low. However, the patent statute requires provisional applications to satisfy the same substantive requirements as non‑provisional applications, including written description, enablement, and patent‑eligible subject matter. If those requirements are not met, the provisional filing may provide little or no protection.Applicants may revise a provisional application when converting it to a non‑provisional application, and many do so extensively to add detail, clarify disclosures, or reflect later‑developed aspects of the technology. Any newly added subject matter, however, is not entitled to the provisional application’s filing date.Some sophisticated filing strategies involve a series of “rolling” provisional applications, followed by a non‑provisional application that claims priority to multiple provisionals. While this approach can be effective, it comes with important limitations. New matter is not entitled to earlier priority, and claims in the non‑provisional application are entitled only to the filing date of the earliest application that adequately supports them. In practice, that supporting application is often the non‑provisional itself.So, the next time you consider a strategy based on provisional filings and later supplementation, ask yourself whether your sense of protection is as strong as you think.

Provisional Patent Applications – Less Protection Than Expected?

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Lack of Candor Undermines Class Counsel’s Adequacy

Navigating Conflicts of Interest Within the Non-Profit World

Changing EEOC Enforcement Priorities and DEI‑Related Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know