Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

I was recently quoted in an article by the legal publication, Law360, sharing my opinion that PFAS may be the “next asbestos” in toxic tort litigation. That was before a study came out in July that found PFAS throughout the food supply chain in white rice, eggs, red meat, seafood, and coffee. Sadly, the more I read about PFAS, the more I fear my opinion will become reality sooner than later. Indeed, some scientists contend PFAS has "contaminated every corner of the globe." All that said, the science on the health impacts of PFAS exposure is still developing. So far, these and other synthetic chemicals have been "linked" to multiple health problems – scientists sometimes refer to this as an "association" – but the question of whether there is a causal connection is up in the air. Particularly from a dose-response perspective. Meaning, what intensity, frequency, and duration of exposure to PFAS is required to cause an adverse health impact in humans?Beyond the science, there is the practical question of what can be done to curtail or eliminate PFAS exposure given its ubiquity in our world. The scientists in this article contend its use needs to be banned. Which sounds good in theory, but what steps need to be taken to achieve that objective? I will continue to monitor this issue as both the science and the efforts to limit PFAS exposure continue to evolve. <input type='hidden' id='passle-remote-hosting-tracking-shortcode' value='102jg2n'/><blockquote class="wp-block-quote passle-quote has-cite-link">The latest finding follows mounting concern around the presence of the synthetic chemicals in everyday foods, which have been linked to a number of health problems​, including cancer, thyroid disease, liver damage and fertility issues.<cite><a href="https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2024/07/31/pfas-found-in-food-supply-chains" aria-label="www.foodnavigator.com/..." title="https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2024/07/31/pfas-found-in-food-supply-chains" target="_blank">www.foodnavigator.com/...</a></cite></blockquote>

PFAS is everywhere. What are we going to do about it?

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

The Contract Review Nobody Asks For — And Why I Do It Anyway

Venture Best Spotlight Season Three Episode Two

Before the Problem: What It Actually Costs to Call Your Attorney First