Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

<p>Under the United States Small Business Administration’s (SBA) 8(a) program, certain racial and ethnic groups are extended a rebuttable presumption that they are socially disadvantaged to qualify for the program. However, this practice has come to a screeching halt based on a recent decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. According to the Court, use of this rebuttable presumption was not narrowly tailored nor were the Defendants (SBA and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)) able to show a compelling interest in their use of the rebuttable presumption as it applied to the plaintiff. As a result, the court found that this practice violated the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and enjoined the SBA and USDA from using this presumption. While this issue is far from being finalized, until it is, this ruling will likely stymie the government’s process for qualifying businesses for the 8(a) program. Click <a href="https://fedscoop.com/judge-enjoins-presumed-racial-disadvantage-sba-program/" target="_self">here</a> to learn more.</p><input type='hidden' id='passle-remote-hosting-tracking-shortcode' value='102il69'/><blockquote class="wp-block-quote passle-quote has-cite-link"><p>&quot;Without stated goals for the 8(a) program or an understanding of whether certain minorities are underrepresented in a particular industry, Defendants cannot measure the utility of the rebuttable presumption in remedying the effects of past racial discrimination.&quot; - Judge Clifton L. Corker</p><cite><a href="https://fedscoop.com/judge-enjoins-presumed-racial-disadvantage-sba-program/" aria-label="fedscoop.com/..." title="https://fedscoop.com/judge-enjoins-presumed-racial-disadvantage-sba-program/" target="_blank">fedscoop.com/...</a></cite></blockquote><div class="passle-featured-image passle-featured-image-position-bottom"><img src="https://images.passle.net/fit-in/400x400/filters:crop(0,0,3779,2126)/Passle/5f6edd8e8cb62a0bec3e5fd2/SearchServiceImages/2023-07-31-20-35-01-941-64c81af5f70d99ab287dfbd0.jpg" alt="Featured Image" /></div>

Look Out SBA, Use of A Race-Based Rebuttable Presumption for 8(a) Qualification Is Unconstitutional

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Before the Problem: What It Actually Costs to Call Your Attorney First

2 Months into the New “No-Deny” Era of SEC Enforcement Settlements

SEC Raises “Qualified Client” Thresholds

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Before the Problem: What It Actually Costs to Call Your Attorney First

2 Months into the New “No-Deny” Era of SEC Enforcement Settlements

SEC Raises “Qualified Client” Thresholds

Slide Menu

Slide Search