Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

Food industry trade groups including the American Beverage Association, the Consumer Brands Association and the National Confectioners Association, sued the State of Texas earlier this month claiming that portions of its “Make Texas Healthy Again” Act are unconstitutional because the government is forcing them to spread inaccurate information about the safety of products, and undermines the domestic regulation of food safety. The Complaint alleges the Act, signed into law in the summer of 2025, compels members of these trade groups to provide warning labels about 44 ingredients present in their foods. Those labels state that the ingredients aren't recommended for human consumption by foreign governments, even though they have been safely used in American foods for decades, the groups said.The bill allegedly "violates the First Amendment rights of Texans by compelling businesses to tell consumers false and misleading information about the ingredients in their products," the industry groups said in a statement. Moreover, the labeling requirements violate the Constitution's commerce clause by making businesses from all over the country change their labels in accordance with Texas' law, according to the complaint. "This overreach disrupts the national market and creates a confusing patchwork of state laws, with burdens that outweigh any local benefits," the groups said.I will be watching the arc of this case closely. Texas, California, and other states are passing all sorts of laws ostensibly designed to enhance the safety of the food and beverages sold to their citizens. This is one of the few instances where the food and beverage industry has chosen to fight back. The outcome here may foretell the likelihood that future legislation in other states becomes the subject of litigation, compromise, or something else. Stay tuned. <input type='hidden' id='passle-remote-hosting-tracking-shortcode' value='102lz9v'/><blockquote class="wp-block-quote passle-quote has-cite-link">The labeling requirement violates the First Amendment by forcing businesses to reiterate &quot;government-scripted&quot; messages, and ones that are inaccurate and misleading to boot ... &quot;There&#039;s no legitimate government interest in forcing businesses to spread false messages to consumers that don&#039;t advance safety and transparency,&quot; [the food industry trade groups] said.<cite><a href="https://www.law360.com/cannabis/articles/2419429" aria-label="www.law360.com/..." title="https://www.law360.com/cannabis/articles/2419429" target="_blank">www.law360.com/...</a></cite></blockquote>

core/freeform

Is the Texas food labelling law unconstitutional?

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

PFAS in Biosolids/Industrial Sludges — Time Marches On

The Bayh-Dole Act: What Licensees and Grantees of Federally Funded Technology Need to Know

Mayer Featured in Law360 article, “Michael Best Taps Jones Lang LaSalle Exec For COO Role”