Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

Illinois’ new jurisdictional rules could have many companies singing “Sweet Home Chicago” (. . . or rather the Cook, Madison, and St. Clair County Courthouses). This week, Illinois amended its rules of civil procedure to allow its state courts to exercise jurisdiction over non-Illinois companies in many toxic tort cases so long as the company is registered to do business in the state.

core/paragraph

Under the new rules, a company’s registration in the state allows the court to treat it as functionally “at-home” in Illinois, and therefore subject to general jurisdiction in the state, in many cases involving materials subject to the Illinois Uniform Hazardous Substances Act.

This is true regardless of whether the company does <strong>any</strong> business in Illinois, or if the business it does conduct there relates to the materials at issue in the plaintiff’s lawsuit. So long as the plaintiff sues another defendant over which the court has “traditional” jurisdiction – for example, by actually manufacturing and selling products in Illinois – the plaintiff can also join a whole swath of non-Illinois defendants in the lawsuit, too.

This new regime greatly expands Illinois’ jurisdictional reach in toxic tort cases, and pushes the outer limits the U.S. Supreme Court has articulated for so-called “consent-based” jurisdiction. Bill 328 is sure to face legal challenge, perhaps all the way to the Supreme Court. In the meantime, critics portend a floodgate of new filings in Illinois’ already plaintiff-friendly courts. The friendly confines, indeed.

Please reach out to your Michael Best attorney with any questions.

Conference room table set with notepads and pens beside leather chairs in a modern office.

Blurred view of a conference room table with chairs and documents arranged for a meeting.

Illinois rolls out the (un)welcome mat for many new potential products liability defendants

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Lack of Candor Undermines Class Counsel’s Adequacy

Navigating Conflicts of Interest Within the Non-Profit World

Changing EEOC Enforcement Priorities and DEI‑Related Discrimination: What Employers Need to Know