Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

While the United States and many other countries wrestle with how plant-based products designed to substitute as meats should be labeled or otherwise described, France has enacted a decree that says exactly what words cannot be used – and it is a long list. Moreover, the French ban extends beyond plant-based products; it also applies to products made from fungi, mycoprotein, and any other type of meat substitute. Here are the terms that are now off the table (pun intended) to manufacturers of meat alternatives: filet, faux filet (rib eye, sirloin), rumsteck (rump streak), entrecote (rib steak), onglet (back steak), bifteck (beefsteak), flanchet (flank), steak, escalope (cutlet), and jambon (ham). The French decree does allow for plant proteins to be included in meat products marketed as meat, but only if it meets specific proportion requirements. For example, bacon can include up to 0.5% in plant protein content and still be called “bacon.” But, as one would expect, any product marketed as “meat” must overwhelmingly consist of what consumers have traditionally thought of as “meat” to avoid application of the decree. France is not the only country to adopt this type of decree. South Africa and Italy also ban the use of “meaty” descriptions on plant-based products. Other countries in the European Union have considered similar legislation, but ultimately abandoned the effort. The multi-million-dollar question, of course, is what will the United States do? Will it follow France's lead, or stay somewhat neutral on the subject? I'll be watching, and so should you … <input type='hidden' id='passle-remote-hosting-tracking-shortcode' value='102j1n4'/><blockquote class="wp-block-quote passle-quote has-cite-link">In three months’ time, France will enforce a ban on the use of ‘meaty’ terminology for plant-based products. According to the new decree​ ... vegan steak, meat-free bacon, and plant-based saucisse are off the menu. Operators that don’t comply could be fined up to €7,500.<cite><a href="https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2024/02/28/France-bans-plant-based-steak-vegan-sausage-and-meat-free-bacon-terminology#" aria-label="www.foodnavigator.com/..." title="https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2024/02/28/France-bans-plant-based-steak-vegan-sausage-and-meat-free-bacon-terminology#" target="_blank">www.foodnavigator.com/...</a></cite></blockquote>

France bans the use of “meaty” terms in plant-based products. Will other countries follow suit?

Related People

You may also be interested in these

OSHA Site Targeting 2026: Are You a Target?

Trademark Watch Services in Practice: Turning Alerts into Informed Decisions

Legal Bites: Q4 2025 Edition

Related People

You may also be interested in these

OSHA Site Targeting 2026: Are You a Target?

Trademark Watch Services in Practice: Turning Alerts into Informed Decisions

Legal Bites: Q4 2025 Edition

Slide Menu

Slide Search