Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

<p>On July 1st, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced it will soon open a docket and host two listening sessions to receive public input on needed reforms to the Section 401 program of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The notice indicated that, once published in the Federal Register, the public will have 30 days to provide comment and input on the Agency's 2023 implementation rule.  </p><p>Section 401 of the CWA requires states and authorized tribes to certify (or deny or waive) that certain federally regulated projects, such as a hydroelectric generating facility regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), will comply with adopted state or tribal water quality standards. As USEPA indicated in a memorandum issued in May, telegraphing the docket, the scope of that review is to be limited and time-bound. However, the 401 certification process has been used to slow or frustrate disputed projects, leading in many cases to infrastructure project delays or wholesale cancellations. </p><p>The certification is intended to be limited to water quality issues, but project proponents have complained that certain states have conditioned certifications to address project impacts well beyond water quality, such as air quality, noise, traffic, and other “nuisance” type impacts. </p><p>If you work in these project programs, now is the time to bring forward your concerns and suggested improvements to an Administration that is open to change.   </p><input type='hidden' id='passle-remote-hosting-tracking-shortcode' value='102kqu0'/><blockquote class="wp-block-quote passle-quote has-cite-link"><p>“It is our responsibility to guarantee Clean Water Act Section 401 is only being used for its statutory purpose – to ensure permitted projects protect water quality while delivering real prosperity for all Americans.” ~ Nominee for Assistant Administrator of the Office of Water, Jessica Kramer.</p><cite><a href="https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USEPAAO/bulletins/3e768c3" aria-label="content.govdelivery.com/..." title="https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USEPAAO/bulletins/3e768c3" target="_blank">content.govdelivery.com/...</a></cite></blockquote><div class="passle-featured-image passle-featured-image-position-bottom"><img src="https://images.passle.net/fit-in/400x400/filters:crop(0,0,3999,2250)/Passle/5f6edd8e8cb62a0bec3e5fd2/SearchServiceImages/2025-07-02-13-17-42-657-686531762730a92ea84e1915.jpg" alt="Featured Image" /></div>

De-weaponizing Clean Water Act Section 401

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Michael Best Welcomes Dana Bell as Senior Counsel in Intellectual Property Practice

Seventh Circuit Grapples with BIPA Amendment.

Federal Court Blocks Oregon EPR Law — Implications Beyond Oregon