Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

<p>For software companies, protecting intellectual property is not just a legal issue—it’s a business decision. One question comes up repeatedly: <strong>Should we register a copyright for our software, or is it better protected as a trade secret?</strong></p><div><p>The answer is not always obvious. In fact, for many companies, the wrong choice can unintentionally expose sensitive technology or weaken long‑term competitive advantage.</p><p>Below is a practical framework to help software businesses decide what to protect—and how.</p><h2>Copyright vs. Trade Secret: The Basics</h2><p><strong>Copyright</strong> protects original software code as a literary work. While copyright exists automatically when code is created, registration provides meaningful advantages, including enhanced enforcement rights, statutory damages, and a public record of ownership.</p><p><strong>Trade secrets</strong>, by contrast, protect information that derives value from not being generally known and is subject to reasonable efforts to keep it confidential. This can include algorithms, internal logic, system architecture, or other non‑public technical details.</p><p>The key difference is disclosure: copyright registration requires submitting a deposit copy of the work, while trade secret protection depends on keeping information secret.</p><h2>When Copyright Protection Makes Sense</h2><p>Copyright registration is often the right choice when:</p><ul><li>The software will be distributed or licensed to customers or partners.</li><li>The company wants a clear, public record of ownership.</li><li>Enforcement against copying is a realistic concern.</li><li>The code can be described or deposited without revealing sensitive internal details.</li></ul><p>For many companies, registering copyright in core applications or user‑facing code is an important part of protecting brand value and market position.</p><h2>When Trade Secret Protection May Be Better</h2><p>Trade secret protection may be preferable when:</p><ul><li>The code is deeply embedded in a larger system and difficult to separate.</li><li>Disclosure would reveal implementation details competitors could exploit.</li><li>The value lies in <i>how</i> the software works internally, not how it appears externally.</li><li>The company has strong confidentiality controls, such as access restrictions and NDAs.</li></ul><p>In practice, software teams sometimes decide that filing a copyright application for certain components would require disclosing too much. In those cases, treating the functionality as a trade secret can be the smarter business move.</p><h2>The Overlooked Risk of Copyright Disclosure</h2><p>One issue companies often underestimate is that copyright registration requires submitting code to the Copyright Office. While partial redaction may be allowed, enough must be disclosed to identify the work.</p><p>For highly sensitive components—such as proprietary connectors, algorithms, or internal tools—this disclosure alone can destroy trade secret status. Once information is publicly disclosed, trade secret protection may be lost permanently.</p><p>This is often why companies choose to exclude specific modules from copyright filings and instead protect them internally as trade secrets.</p><h2>A Hybrid Approach Is Often Best</h2><p>For many software businesses, the best answer is not “copyright or trade secret,” but both.</p><p>A layered strategy may include:</p><ul><li>Registering copyright for the overall platform or user‑facing code.</li><li>Maintaining trade secret protection for internal components that provide competitive advantage.</li><li>Clearly documenting which assets are protected under which regime—and why.</li></ul><p>This approach allows companies to benefit from strong enforcement rights while still preserving secrecy where it matters most.</p><h2>Key Questions to Ask Before Filing</h2><p>Before filing—or deciding not to file—a copyright application, companies should consider:</p><ul><li>Will this code ever be shared outside the company?</li><li>Would disclosure harm our competitive position?</li><li>Do we have adequate confidentiality measures in place?</li><li>Is this code better protected as part of a broader work or excluded entirely?</li><li>How does this choice align with our long‑term business goals?</li></ul><h2>Final Takeaway</h2><p>There is no one‑size‑fits‑all solution for protecting software. Copyright registration offers powerful benefits, but it comes with disclosure. Trade secret protection can preserve competitive advantage—but only if secrecy is actively maintained.</p><p>For many software companies, the smartest strategy is a deliberate combination of both, tailored to how the software is developed, used, and monetized.</p></div>

Copyright or Trade Secret? How Software Companies Should Decide What to Protect—and How

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Michael Best Welcomes Dana Bell as Senior Counsel in Intellectual Property Practice

Seventh Circuit Grapples with BIPA Amendment.

Federal Court Blocks Oregon EPR Law — Implications Beyond Oregon