Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

<p>A comic book creator, Kristina Kashtanova, submitted a copyright application to the U.S. Copyright Office for her comic book, which included AI-generated images.  She used an artificial intelligence platform, Midjourney, to create the images by providing Midjourney with descriptive text of what the illustrations should look like.</p><p>The Copyright Office initially allowed the registration and protection of the <u>full</u> comic book, including the AI-generated images. In a letter issued this week, the Office cancelled part of the registration due its discovery that the registration was based on "inaccurate and incomplete information." Kashtanova did not explain that the illustrations were AI-generated when she submitted the application. </p><p>Kashtanova argued that she authored every part of the work since she directed the platform on how to create the illustration. She claimed the illustrations were merely "AI-assisted." However, the Office concluded that using an AI-generated platform to create the illustrations was "not the same as that of a human artist, writer or photographer," which is how copyright rights arise. The Office doubled down that Kashtanova did not create the illustrations; the artificial intelligence program did.</p><p>The Office then replaced the original registration with a more limited one. The new registration covers the text in the comic book and the "selection and arrangement" of the images and text in the comic book. The images in the comic book were expressly excluded.  The registration states that the exclusion applies to "artwork generated by artificial intelligence." </p><p>The selection and arrangement of the images is (and has always been) a valid authorship contribution to a work. It appears that with this case, the Copyright Office has clarified its approach to AI-generated content and the parameters of copyright protection - noting that while the arrangement of the AI-generated content is protectable, the content itself is not.  </p><input type='hidden' id='passle-remote-hosting-tracking-shortcode' value='102i8lp'/><blockquote class="wp-block-quote passle-quote has-cite-link"><p>&quot;The new registration will explicitly exclude &#039;artwork generated by artificial intelligence.&#039;&quot;</p><cite><a href="https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1579038?nl_pk=6a67d4eb-f19b-4d7d-a658-180cbad90b58&#038;utm_content=2023-02-24&#038;read_more=1&#038;nlsidx=0&#038;nlaidx=13" aria-label="www.law360.com/..." title="https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1579038?nl_pk=6a67d4eb-f19b-4d7d-a658-180cbad90b58&amp;utm_content=2023-02-24&amp;read_more=1&amp;nlsidx=0&amp;nlaidx=13" target="_blank">www.law360.com/...</a></cite></blockquote><div class="passle-featured-image passle-featured-image-position-bottom"><img src="https://images.passle.net/fit-in/400x400/filters:crop(0,0,610,342)/Passle/5f6edd8e8cb62a0bec3e5fd2/SearchServiceImages/2023-02-24-14-05-34-653-63f8c42ef636e90b1cada788.jpg" alt="Featured Image" /></div>

AI-Generated Art – Protectable Under Copyright?

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Michael Best Welcomes Dana Bell as Senior Counsel in Intellectual Property Practice

Seventh Circuit Grapples with BIPA Amendment.

Federal Court Blocks Oregon EPR Law — Implications Beyond Oregon