Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

Recent decisions in Kadrey v. Meta and Bartz v. Anthropic have drawn attention for their implications on AI training and copyright law. In both cases, federal judges found that using copyrighted books to train large language models (LLMs) could qualify as “transformative” under the fair use doctrine. This suggests that, under certain conditions, AI developers may be shielded from liability when repurposing creative works for model training.However, these rulings are narrow in scope and should not be viewed as definitive guidance. The courts emphasized that their decisions were based on the specific facts presented—particularly the lack of demonstrated market harm by the plaintiffs. Moreover, Judge Alsup’s opinion in the Anthropic case highlighted that even if a use is transformative, the method of acquiring training data (e.g., through pirated sources) could still raise legal concerns.For legal and compliance teams, these cases are just one piece of a much larger puzzle. They underscore the importance of evaluating both the purpose of use and the provenance of training data. As the legal framework around AI and copyright continues to evolve, companies should remain cautious and seek tailored advice when navigating fair use in this rapidly developing area. <input type='hidden' id='passle-remote-hosting-tracking-shortcode' value='102kssr'/><blockquote class="wp-block-quote passle-quote has-cite-link">&quot;We appreciate today’s decision from the Court,&quot; said a Meta spokesperson about the ruling. &quot;Open-source AI models are powering transformative innovations, productivity and creativity for individuals and companies, and fair use of copyright material is a vital legal framework for building this transformative technology.&quot;<cite><a href="https://mashable.com/article/kadrey-v-meta-judge-rules-against-plaintiffs" aria-label="mashable.com/..." title="https://mashable.com/article/kadrey-v-meta-judge-rules-against-plaintiffs" target="_blank">mashable.com/...</a></cite></blockquote><div class="passle-featured-image passle-featured-image-position-bottom"><img src="https://images.passle.net/fit-in/400x400/filters:crop(0,0,2308,1293)/Passle/5f6edd8e8cb62a0bec3e5fd2/SearchServiceImages/2025-07-11-14-14-05-597-68711c2def6ace04b1558032.jpg" alt="Featured Image" /></div>

AI Copyright Rulings Signal a New Era for Fair Use

Related People

Related Capabilities

You may also be interested in these

Trump Trade 2.0: Two Weeks Post-IEEPA Decision

How a More Complex Legal Structure Can Protect Your Business

Upcoming Webinar: Trade and Tariff Landscape Updates