Full-Service Law Firm solving complex challenges through bold thinking, precise execution, and shared purpose.

Full Service Law Firm | Michael Best & Friedrich LLP

Specializing in the Intersection of Business &amp; Government

Meet our team of trusted advisors, strategic thinkers, and community builders dedicated to client success.

Learn about our full-service legal and business solutions, designed to address complex challenges for leading organizations across industries.

Access thought leadership, news, and resources to stay informed about the latest trends, legal developments, and industry innovations.

Discover how partnership, bold thinking, and precise execution drive results for clients nationwide.

Explore how our national reach and local expertise support clients across the United States and beyond.

Grow at a firm designed to bring out your best.

core/heading

Strategic Defense for Complex Employment Disputes

Michael Best’s Employment Litigation team defends employers in high-stakes matters ranging from single-plaintiff claims to sophisticated, multi-jurisdictional class and collective actions. With deep experience before administrative agencies and in state and federal courts nationwide, we pair rigorous case assessments with practical business insight to deliver efficient, defensible outcomes.

core/paragraph

Our Approach: Tailored Litigation Strategies Aligned to Your Business Goals

Understand Your Risks and Opportunities: We start every matter with a candid, data-driven evaluation of claims, evidence, witnesses, venue and judge profiles, and potential exposure, so you have a clear view of risk and opportunity from day one.

Craft Strategic Legal Next Steps: Working shoulder-to-shoulder with in-house counsel and business leaders, we build a customized strategy that aligns legal tactics with enterprise priorities—whether that means quick, quiet resolution; targeted dispositive motions; class certification defense; or trial to verdict.

Relentlessly Pursue Your Goals: Our attorneys are adept at leveraging the full spectrum of pretrial tools and alternative dispute resolution to resolve cases efficiently, and we are relentless in pursuing decertification and defeating class certification where appropriate. When trial is warranted, clients benefit from our courtroom experience and disciplined preparation.

Legal Support that Has Your Back: We emphasize clear communication, budget predictability, and operational continuity. This allows us to manage discovery burdens, preserve privilege, safeguard brand reputation, and position matters for optimal outcomes on appeal if necessary.

We regularly represent clients in all types of disputes arising out of the employment relationship, concerning matters such as:

Discrimination and harassment under federal, state, and local laws

core/list-item

Wage and hour class and collective actions

Workplace safety and health (OSHA) enforcement

Employee benefits and executive compensation disputes

Unemployment and workers’ compensation claims

Contractual and tort-based employment claims

Restrictive covenants, unfair competition, and trade secrets

Class and collective action strategy, including certification/decertification, damages modeling, and expert coordination

Compliance counseling and risk mitigation integrated with litigation

core/list

Defended a national taxicab company in a wage and hour case in which cab drivers challenged the industry business model. The plaintiffs asserted that cab drivers were employees under state law and, therefore, the defendant cab companies had violated the law by failing to pay minimum wage and overtime and by deducting fees from the drivers’ wages. The Seventh Circuit rejected these claims and found that the cited law did not apply to the drivers, because the cab companies did not promise or contract to pay wages to the drivers.

core/media-text

We represent a Catholic university in Chicago, providing employment counsel and litigation defense. Michael Best defended the university in litigation in the Northern District of Illinois, brought by a former adjunct professor alleging Title IX violations, 42 USC 1981 violations, Title VII violations, and multiple state law claims. The court dismissed the Title IX claims with prejudice and the Title VII and state law claims without prejudice. This decision was seminal in the legal battle of the scope of Title IX. We persuaded the court that Title IX should not extend to claims that should be covered by Title VII, even when the individual bringing the claims is barred from pursuing the Title VII claims. This is the first decision in the country we are aware of addressing this factual situation and still dismissing the Title IX claim. In addition, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction seeking to remove an article from the student newspaper website regarding accusations against the plaintiff.

Abstract, blurred view of a modern office hallway with glass walls and soft ambient lighting.

Employment Litigation

Key Contact

Trending Conversations for Employment Litigation

One Word in a Signature Block Could Make You Personally Liable

What Does Outside General Counsel Actually Mean?

The Nation’s Top Civil Rights Agencies Prioritize Prosecuting DEI and Eliminating Enforcement of Disparate Impact Claims

Key Contact

Trending Conversations for Employment Litigation

One Word in a Signature Block Could Make You Personally Liable

What Does Outside General Counsel Actually Mean?

The Nation’s Top Civil Rights Agencies Prioritize Prosecuting DEI and Eliminating Enforcement of Disparate Impact Claims

Slide Menu

Slide Search